[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:02:19 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: no 2.0-stable ISO?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:17:43AM +0300, (GalaxyMaster) wrote:
> Today I was asked for a recommendation what other person should install
> on their office router. No doubt I suggested Owl, but when I was asked
> for an ISO image URL I figured out that I can provide them with the
> Owl-current ISO only since Owl-2.0-release is too old and Owl-2.0-stable
> has no ISO image at all:
...
> Perhaps this is something to fix?
Yes - but perhaps this is to be fixed for 2.1-stable (once we have it),
not for 2.0-stable. That's because we only have the "make iso.gz"
functionality in -current (which the next release will be based on), not
in 2.0-stable, and we're being very conservative at getting changes into
2.0-stable. I don't think we should change that approach now; I think
that it is more productive for us to concentrate on getting a new
release out sooner rather than later.
Right now, our users who want 2.0-stable should install 2.0-release,
then upgrade to 2.0-stable. Indeed, this is not perfect - more work to
do and potential extra hardware support issues with the older kernel in
2.0-release.
Thanks,
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: 5B341F15 fp: B3FB 63F4 D7A3 BCCC 6F6E FC55 A2FC 027C 5B34 1F15
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail owl-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
