Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:00:51 +0400 From: Grigoriy Strokin <grg@...nwall.com> To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Owl-based desktop environment Solar, On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:01:09AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 02:52:52PM +0400, Grigoriy Strokin wrote: > > I've installed the following RPMs from FC4: > > > > expat-1.95.8-6.i386.rpm > ... > > xorg-x11-twm-6.8.2-31.i386.rpm > > > > I have also installed one rpm from FC3: > > > > ttmkfdir-3.0.9-14.i386.rpm > > Did you install these on Owl 2.0 or on Owl-current? Owl-current. > Did you manage to have all dependencies satisfied, or did you have to > resort to --nodeps in some cases? I only used --nodeps in cases where required libraries are installed, but their package name is different from what rpm expected. > IIRC, the dependencies on Qt and Kerberos that I had mentioned were > compile-time (but it's been 2 years, so I might recall incorrectly). > I'm not sure if the minimum required set of binary (sub)packages would > have these dependencies, too. No, there were no dependencies on Qt or Kerberos. > Please note that there are some security risks associated with having > these packages installed and with using them. Specifically, there are > SUID/SGID binaries (the X server and more) - you'll want to restrict > access to those (with groups). Also, these packages are a bit dated and > do not contain Red Hat's newer security fixes, although I am not aware > of any that would affect your intended use. Thanks! -- Grigoriy. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail owl-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.