Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:37:01 +0200
From: Stanislav <owl@...e.org>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: static-route

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:24:53 +0400
Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:43:21PM +0200, Stanislav wrote:
> > is it correct that 
> > 
> > root:~# cat /etc/sysconfig/static-routes  
> > any net x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x gw x.x.x.x
> > 
> > should add a static route entry ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Neither /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes
> > nor /etc/rc.d/init.d/network use it !?
> 
> They do, but:
> 
> 1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/network in older versions of Owl had a typo that
> prevented this from working.  The bug was fixed over a year ago:
> 
> * Tue May 24 2005 (GalaxyMaster) <galaxy-at-owl.openwall.com> 0.24-owl1
> - Fixed a typo in /etc/rc.d/init.d/network which used to break the static
> routes logic. Thanks to DaNuk <noc at spacenet.ru> for pointing it out.
> 
> You didn't mention what version of Owl you're using, but I am guessing
> that it's an old one.

Hello, yes it is. Its the old 1.1 Version. Its running like a charm.

Of course i took a look into the new/last package of owl-startup. More
exact only into pool/sources/owl-startup/initscripts-5.00-1.src.rpm
and didnt find any differences. Therefore i was a bit irritated. 

After your response i found it of course in the native package.

initscripts-5.00-owl-network-typo.diff

Thank you

Stanislav

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.