Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:37:01 +0200 From: Stanislav <owl@...e.org> To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: static-route On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:24:53 +0400 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:43:21PM +0200, Stanislav wrote: > > is it correct that > > > > root:~# cat /etc/sysconfig/static-routes > > any net x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x gw x.x.x.x > > > > should add a static route entry ? > > Yes. > > > Neither /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes > > nor /etc/rc.d/init.d/network use it !? > > They do, but: > > 1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/network in older versions of Owl had a typo that > prevented this from working. The bug was fixed over a year ago: > > * Tue May 24 2005 (GalaxyMaster) <galaxy-at-owl.openwall.com> 0.24-owl1 > - Fixed a typo in /etc/rc.d/init.d/network which used to break the static > routes logic. Thanks to DaNuk <noc at spacenet.ru> for pointing it out. > > You didn't mention what version of Owl you're using, but I am guessing > that it's an old one. Hello, yes it is. Its the old 1.1 Version. Its running like a charm. Of course i took a look into the new/last package of owl-startup. More exact only into pool/sources/owl-startup/initscripts-5.00-1.src.rpm and didnt find any differences. Therefore i was a bit irritated. After your response i found it of course in the native package. initscripts-5.00-owl-network-typo.diff Thank you Stanislav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.