Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:53:06 -0400 (EDT) From: <solar@...bsd.net> To: OWL LIST <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: ext3 vs reiserfs Lets see I think the beauty of the linux kernel is you can add anything you want with it. I have a ow3-hap5-sf1-linbsd-ext3 kernel patch put together http://linbsd.net/linux/kernel/patches/v2.2/linux-2.2.19-ow3-hap5-linbsd1.patchhttp://linbsd.net/linux/kernel/patches/v2.2/linux-2.2.19-ow3-hap5-linbsd1.patch However I dont think its Solar Designer intention to include support for anything other than the original ow patches in OWL. On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 beldridg@...ox.com wrote: > On 23 Oct 2001 mysiar@...pl wrote: > > > So maybe somebody was thinking the same about journaling FS's and an > > spare some experience or some good thoughts. :-))) > > the 2.4 kernel isn't officially supported yet and ext3/reiser support in > the 2.2 kernels isn't maintained as well. > > i started using reiserfs on test machines about six months ago and have > never had a problem. i've heard that ext3 is good as well. > > the main reason i like reiser is that i don't have to apply kernel patches > -> which means i don't have to remove them before applying the regular > kernel upgrade patches. > > > - brett >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.