Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:56:36 +0300
From: "(GalaxyMaster)" <>
Subject: Re: sqlite


On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:28:26AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> In sqlite.spec, you wrote:
> # Source:
> Source: %name-%version.tar.xz

You are correct.  I'll adjust the package to use the original tarball.
The reason for the repackaging was that it was a bit harder to convert
between the %version and that XYYZZPP versioning used by SQLite than
simply repackage the tarball with the <name>-<version> convention.

However, I see your point and agree that such a repackaging makes it
much harder to verify the authenticity of the sources.  Will figure
something out to make the conversion of %version to SQLite's version


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.