Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:56:36 +0300 From: "(GalaxyMaster)" <galaxy@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: sqlite Solar, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:28:26AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote: > In sqlite.spec, you wrote: > > # Source: http://www.sqlite.org/2013/sqlite-autoconf-3080200.tar.gz > Source: %name-%version.tar.xz You are correct. I'll adjust the package to use the original tarball. The reason for the repackaging was that it was a bit harder to convert between the %version and that XYYZZPP versioning used by SQLite than simply repackage the tarball with the <name>-<version> convention. However, I see your point and agree that such a repackaging makes it much harder to verify the authenticity of the sources. Will figure something out to make the conversion of %version to SQLite's version string. -- (GM)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.