Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:58:41 +0300
Subject: Re: Re: [owl-users] Owl 3.1-stable

On 2015-01-11 20:02:20 +0300, wrote:

 >>> Such ability is good for people who prefer to do everything
 >>> manually.
 >> The primary reason for doing that was the need to build more
 >> complex configurations than a single ethernet link.
 > Well, it is possible to have as many interfaces as you want
 > without the need of overriding the Owl default networking startup;
 > However, I perfectly understand you: more automation always means
 > less flexibility.

Yes. That's why I'd recommend leave it for trivial configurations,
and allow overriding it for complex systems.

TWIMBI: now I'm administering over a hundred of physical servers
at 7 different locations - so I think I've got a bit more close
to understanding of what do our users really need :-)

Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin <gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru>
GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.