Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:13:30 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: fakechroot (in rpm package) Galaxy, I think it was a really bad idea for you to introduce patches/2.17.2-owl-old-glibc.diff inside the fakechroot tarball, thereby having to repackage it and thus making verification of upstream's code authenticity and integrity more difficult. This also goes against revision control for our patches to fakechroot. I think this patch file (and any other patches to fakechroot that we might have later) should be in our native tree instead. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.