Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:53:24 +0400 From: Vasily Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: rpm.spec change for new binutils Solar, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 14:29 +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Your addition of: > > export LDFLAGS="-lrpmio -lpopt -lrpmdb -lrpm" > > to rpm.spec, while needed for building with new binutils, has the > unfortunate side-effect of requiring the rpm-devel subpackage from a > previous build of rpm to be installed for the new build of rpm to > succeed. Without rpm-devel installed, ./configure fails with "C > compiler cannot create executables". > > Additionally, a concern is that something may actually be getting picked > up from the previous rpm build via its rpm-devel - requiring one more > rebuild of rpm to have a fully new build of it. Ouch. That's right. My fault. > Until the binutils upgrade, rpm-devel was not required for Owl builds, > and it is not currently installed into our OpenVZ templates (which are > meant to be sufficient for Owl rebuilds). > > Can you try to come up with a better fix for this, please? What are > other distros doing? I've added a patch for explicit using in-build-tree libraries. Now rpm is buildable witout rpm-deve. Thanks, -- Vasily
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.