Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:00:12 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: __libc_enable_secure with new binutils Dmitry, Vasily - After binutils upgrade to 126.96.36.199.1 (maybe also after Vasily's upgrade to 188.8.131.52.1 - I just did not test it) and some Owl rebuilds (including rebuild of other packages with glibc previously rebuilt with the new binutils), packages that use __libc_enable_secure have started to require ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)(64bit) (and probably something similar on other archs). As a workaround, I am thinking of having our glibc provide it (right from glibc.spec), but what would your recommended fix be? Perhaps make __libc_enable_secure more official? Dmitry - did you run into this issue in ALT Linux? Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.