Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:37:38 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: procps-3.2.8

Ok, I compare the patch from ALT to Owl patches...

thx,
daniel


2012/6/22 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:39:51PM +0200, Daniel Cegie?ka wrote:
>> In procps-3.2.5-suse-top-cpus.diff:
> ...
>> I understand that I leave as it is in the new code, right?
>
> Perhaps, but in general: please update us to what's in ALT Linux first,
> and then we may discuss what other changes we may want/need to make.
>
> As to one big -alt.diff patch (whatever is in ALT's package due to their
> git) vs. broken out patches (like what we have for 3.2.5 now), I don't
> have strong feelings one way or the other.  One big patch may be easier
> in the long run if we're to continue sync'ing this with ALT.  Broken out
> patches would make it easier what changed in our package.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.