Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 23:10:50 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: keytab-lilo Hi, We happen to have three source files for / different implementations of keytab-lilo in Owl: 1. Perl script coming from upstream LILO. 2. C implementation found in our native tree, in the LILO package. 3. Perl script coming from upstream SYSLINUX. Right now, #1 happens to make it into the lilo binary package, #2 is built but is not installed (looks like a lilo.spec bug), and #3 is packaged into syslinux-perl, which is not on default installorder.conf (may only be installed manually). Additionally, the current lilo binary package has the script in /usr/sbin/keytab-lilo, whereas syslinux-perl has it in /usr/bin/keytab-lilo. I am going to exclude /usr/bin/keytab-lilo from packaging into syslinux-perl for now, but we need to decide on which one(?) of the three implementations to be packaging and which of the two directories to install it into. Any suggestions? I am not familiar with keytab-lilo - I think I've never used it. So I also don't care much, but I'd like to clean this up. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.