[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 05:49:00 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: %optflags for new gcc
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:23:54PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 19:21 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
> > > "-fomit-frame-pointer
> > > ...
> > > Enabled at levels -O, -O2, -O3, -Os."
> > >
> > > IOW, it it enabled by default on BOTH -O2 and -Os.
> >
> > I think this is an error in the documentation.
> [...]
> > Notice the "when not optimizing for size" remark. Feel free to test and
> > submit a documentation patch upstream (removing ", -Os" from the list).
>
> OK.
I just did this myself:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51019
I also reported the performance regression with JtR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
