Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 05:49:00 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: %optflags for new gcc On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:23:54PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 19:21 +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/gcc/Optimize-Options.html > > > "-fomit-frame-pointer > > > ... > > > Enabled at levels -O, -O2, -O3, -Os." > > > > > > IOW, it it enabled by default on BOTH -O2 and -Os. > > > > I think this is an error in the documentation. > [...] > > Notice the "when not optimizing for size" remark. Feel free to test and > > submit a documentation patch upstream (removing ", -Os" from the list). > > OK. I just did this myself: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51019 I also reported the performance regression with JtR: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017 Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.