Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 04:46:21 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: %optflags for new gcc On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:37:31AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > 3. -Wl,-z,relro > > I am doing a test build now, no problems so far. This has worked, but some of the resulting binaries are not RELRO, which is caused by %optflags not always being used during linking. This is an instance of the same problem seen with -fstack-protector, except that here instead of a failed build we get no protection. In general, do we want to use %optflags universally - that is, mix both compiler and linker flags in it - or separate it into two somehow? (Or into four, considering our separation for bin vs. lib.) Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.