Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:50:30 +0400
Subject: Re: syslinux

On 28-Oct-2011 15:23:26 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:

 > > > > Oh, the main question: do we need to keep an ability to
 > > > > build ISO with lilo or we've completely moved to ISOLINUX?
 > > > My intent is to completely move to ISOLINUX for our ISOs (but
 > > > keep LILO in Owl for optional use on installed systems).
 > > I think we should start using ISOLINUX for ISOs, but still use
 > > LILO on installed systems by default - that will be the least
 > > impact for existing systems during upgrade.
 > Yes, that's what we should do for now. Possibly moving away from
 > LILO for installed systems is a separate change anyway.

It really is - and, therefore, it should be optional.

Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
<gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.