Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:23:26 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: syslinux

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 02:51:26PM +0400, wrote:
> On 28-Oct-2011 14:42:30 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
>  > > Oh, the main question: do we need to keep an ability to build
>  > > ISO with lilo or we've completely moved to ISOLINUX?
>  > My intent is to completely move to ISOLINUX for our ISOs (but
>  > keep LILO in Owl for optional use on installed systems).
> I think we should start using ISOLINUX for ISOs, but still use
> LILO on installed systems by default - that will be the least
> impact for existing systems during upgrade.

Yes, that's what we should do for now.  Possibly moving away from LILO
for installed systems is a separate change anyway.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.