Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:08:46 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: mpc, gmp, mpfr, gcc .specs Solar, all - On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 13:00 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > > Why? Is this for build-time tests of optional SSE2-specific code that > > gets compiled in? Does the installed package nevertheless work on CPUs > > lacking SSE2? If these guesses are correct, then can we skip such tests > > when building on a CPU lacking SSE2, please? > > I'm not sure. I cannot test it as I have no machine without SSE2 :-) > > If the lack of SSE2 breaks tests only, is it a sufficient check? - > > %ifarch %ix86 > # Test SSE2 libraries only if we either have SSE2 CPU support > # or we don't know whether we have it. > if ! [ -e /proc/cpuinfo ] || grep -q sse2 /proc/cpuinfo; then > cd build-sse2 > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/.libs > %__make check > cd .. > fi > %endif Can someone test it? We need a machine without SSE2 support to (1) try to build RPM and (2) try to install gmp RPM compiled on another machine with SSE2 support. Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.