[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:08:46 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: mpc, gmp, mpfr, gcc .specs
Solar, all -
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 13:00 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > Why? Is this for build-time tests of optional SSE2-specific code that
> > gets compiled in? Does the installed package nevertheless work on CPUs
> > lacking SSE2? If these guesses are correct, then can we skip such tests
> > when building on a CPU lacking SSE2, please?
>
> I'm not sure. I cannot test it as I have no machine without SSE2 :-)
>
> If the lack of SSE2 breaks tests only, is it a sufficient check? -
>
> %ifarch %ix86
> # Test SSE2 libraries only if we either have SSE2 CPU support
> # or we don't know whether we have it.
> if ! [ -e /proc/cpuinfo ] || grep -q sse2 /proc/cpuinfo; then
> cd build-sse2
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/.libs
> %__make check
> cd ..
> fi
> %endif
Can someone test it? We need a machine without SSE2 support to (1)
try to build RPM and (2) try to install gmp RPM compiled on another
machine with SSE2 support.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
