Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:23:39 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.1 Solar, On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 20:12 +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Given your recent commits, what's the readiness status for Owl moving to > gcc 4.6.1? What packages still fail to build, if any? In the first buildworld run all packages are buildable on x86_64. On i386 glibc still fails (an assembler issue). > Are there any known runtime issues with Owl packages rebuilt with gcc > 4.6.1? Currently the rebuilded groff segfaults. The issue is somewhere in glibc symbol table (__sincos() calls itself forever). I'm afraid there will be more such weird issues - we should update glibc itself soon. I'll likely change glibc fix - patch "inline" instances instead of passing -fgnu89-inline in CFLAGS. > And what testing did you perform? Perhaps just multiple > buildworld iterations? Yes, I'll test it this way. > Also, can you please post your updated gcc.spec, along with info on any > issues with it (what you think remains to be done, etc.) such that we > can prepare it for commit? Are you packaging gcc's new files, such as > the libgomp stuff? I'll post spec files tomorrow (there are minor issues I'll fix myself). Thanks, -- Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.