Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 01:44:30 +0300 From: Georgi Geshev <root@...k-labs.exploits-bg.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: gcc update -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 5/6/2011 9:26 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > > For others in here - Georgi only did this test on i686 so far (not > x86_64 yet). (That's fine, I merely want it mentioned.) > I've already done some `buildworld's for both i686 and x86_64 architectures and here's a list of the packages that fail to build - * These are the packages that fail to build for both i686 and x86_64 - cpio db4 elfutils-libelf flex glibc kernel libtool make mdadm perl quota shadow-utils util-linux vim * And there's one more package that only fail to build for i686 - pv Additionally, there's a problem with the (latest) GCC RPM spec file - there seems to be a lot of installed but unpackaged files and packaging some of these may directly result in resolving some of `buildworld' build issues. I'm here with attaching a RPM build log excerpt concerning the aforementioned issue. Regards, Georgi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN3DTKAAoJECp4GRJNSNT5UxsH+wZ2XEozgMCt3R5XSzGMrQkh 3zm1FGCD97AMzGl4SuUZDUiMjQS9IFBEJljjYYytUo7YkgyxrzdTTN72QaJToxIL xKqnqnbNRwyUbGjUPq3a2kfM30PXBYTJokc6SmzF+rpacqY3G5vyzgUS3bEkyggO cu3uLgvP2i1pal7hrUsyx3GUgO1go4cOpAzlZZB/BZOm5UA5341K0spS82WmUU5v iIyD2FX+ZfE70MBeUSkTq7jZRaa2Bas4Fu/HbaJ23AAH6h65/6GG0PG1xvFs4yWe r/L1HXMNujCl0Z/mKycF/+f9liyp+SETN9sIoLjf74xebSnLTt+krmt/2sSpDi8= =Qtfa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- View attachment "Installed-but-unpackaged-files-found.txt" of type "text/plain" (11939 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.