Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 22:26:55 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: gcc update Hi Georgi, On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:32:14AM +0300, Georgi Geshev wrote: > I've built the GCC 4.6.0 (no patches applied), GMP 4.3.2 (appropriate > Fedora patches applied), MPFR 3.0.1 (no patches applied) and MPC 0.9 (no > patches applied) packages, though I still need to clean up and improve > the spec files. Great. Please post your spec files in here - as they are, before you spend any more time on them. I'd like to take a look, and others might provide helpful comments as well. > Here's the list of packages that initially failed to build with the new > compiler toolchain - > > cpio > elfutils-libelf > flex > glibc > kernel > libtool > mdadm > perl > shadow-utils > util-linux > vim > > I'll do my best to further resolve the build issues. Before you do, please post excerpts from build logs showing just how these packages failed to build. For others in here - Georgi only did this test on i686 so far (not x86_64 yet). (That's fine, I merely want it mentioned.) Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.