Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:47:08 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: kernel 028stab089.1 On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:58:04AM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:24 +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > To avoid a possible misunderstanding: the kernel in 3.0-stable should be > > exactly the same as -current's. > > I'm a bit confused with a word "exactly". Do I understand you correctly > - we need not only the kernel update, but also config files changes with > added/changed config options? Definitely. Some of those changes were to fix reliability issues, so we must get the fixes into 3.0-stable, and some others are just nice to have. > And we don't need ping sockets in 3.0, do we? As I mentioned in here earlier, I'd like to get most stuff that we committed into Owl-current so far, into 3.0-stable. About the only major exception is the OpenSSL update and some of its related changes. So I literally mean "exactly the same" as it relates to the kernel - including ping sockets. The only 3.0-stable specific work to do on this update is editing of CHANGES-3.0-stable. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.