Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260911013946.51ca477f@ParkView.BC.CA.Umbrellix.NET>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:39:46 +0000
From: Ellenor Bjornsdottir <ellenor/securesoftware@...rellix.net>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: AI slops from Eve

Hi Jeff,

One and a half small nits:

On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:45:15 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've just reluctantly approved 3 AI slop postings by Eve
> > <ckr927414@...k.li>, who is an "automated security researcher".  I don't
> > know if there's any value in those, but I cannot rule that out.  The
> > value could end up historical preservation of what these reports looked
> > like at the dawn of AI security research.  
> 
> Please refer to computer algorithms as "it", not "who."

In this context, the correct replacement is «which», not «it». «Which» is - in this instance - the inanimate relative pronoun for the nominative and accusative cases in English, replacing the animate «who». («Whose» is the genitive for both the animate and inanimate.)

> > These messages lack a Date header, but they arrived to the list server
> > on September 9 starting 6am UTC and until 11am UTC.  For two of these,
> > she sent several versions of the same posting.  ...  
> 
> Please refer to computer algorithms as "it", not "he" or "she."
> 
> A computer algorithm is not alive and does not have a moral compass.
> Do not personify it.  It is merely a piece of property like a brick.

Boats also do not have moral compasses, and people see fit to refer to them as «she».

> Jeff


-- 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.