|
|
Message-ID: <4310cbe7f8f53860f940208d9eca3d6533733508.camel@debian.org> Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:19:25 +0200 From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking On Fri, 2026-07-31 at 12:42 -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > Projects that reject truthful security reports are putting their users at > > risk. > > > Correction: Linux Foundation stakeholders such as OpenAI, Anthropic, > Microsoft, Google, Facebook, NVIDIA, Oracle, etc. are putting GNOME (and > other project) users at risk. > > I heard that the Linux Foundation has declared the danger of "AI > vulnerabilities" is so great that they are founding a group called > Akrites, devoted to coordinating security incident response. Members can > pay their dues in LLM compute credits. If projects don't fix their > software "fast enough", Akrites will declare themselves the "maintainer > of last resort" to publish a fixed version. > > > Yes, that's right, not "we will provide the fiscal support you've been > lacking for 20 years that resulted in you being so sick and tired of > slaving away for free that you declared Enough Is Enough and drew a > moral line in the sand about what constitutes harassment and bullying". > > Instead, the Linux Foundation will fork your project and declare > themselves the new maintainers and "fix it without you". Hey, I heard about Akrites but missed the fine prints about this. Could you point us to where they talk about this (I assume it's not written exactly like this but still I'd be interested in reading it). Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.