[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3a10943-f7c6-4c1c-be55-c62d39d9b70d@pipping.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:02:34 +0200
From: Sebastian Pipping <sebastian@...ping.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking
On 7/31/26 17:39, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> To be fair: Michael Catanzaro is saying he's simply abiding by the request of
> those projects. They don't want to receive any AI-generated content,
> and since most vulnerability reports have AI-generated content, Michael won't send them any.
Abiding by their request would mean to forward any report where it's
not clear whether AI was involved or not (or doesn't look like it) and
to leave the final decision to them. The post is saying…
"it’s nice to not have to guess whether the issue report is
AI-generated or not"
…so it's a conscious choice and not just abiding to what projects
asked for, the way I read it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
