Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <amASeYjj8RXx9Glx@netmeister.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:44:41 -0400
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@...meister.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 432 Linux kernel CVEs

Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@...oden.eu> wrote:
> I wonder a bit what your desire is.

I'm looking to take the temperature on how people are
responding to a significant influx of reported CVE
fixes.  I believe it ought to change how organizations
handle linux kernel security updates.

I currently see the following possible approaches:

1) I don't care: I always run the latest kernel
everywhere and update at least once per
$toleranceTimeWindow across all systems I manage.

2) I do care: I review every single CVE and decide
which changes I need to address / backport in my
environment.

3) I update selectively whenever a single
vulnerability makes big enough waves that somebody
bothers me.  This usually happens in panic mode.


(1) is great, but I haven't seen that be a realistic
option in large environments.

(2) hasn't been a scalable approach for a while, and
perhaps the recent volume changes are leading to
people to stop deceiving themselves.

(3) is what I see most people do.  It kind of "worked"
if you got a small number of events per year, not per
week.


I can see the arguments for "every kernel bug is a
potential security vulnerability" and that thus
assigning CVE IDs here is meaningless.

But I'd like to understand how others are handling
linux kernel vulnerabilities.

> Well, i saw the last perl thing which i liked.

> Fwiw i like the cURL reports, they are really meaningful and give
> pointers i can follow.

Right, so for these two cases, it sounds like you want
to have the ability to individually review and assess
vulnerabilities.

>  Of course if there would be hundreds...

Ay, there's the rub.

-Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.