![]() |
|
Message-ID: <aCiK2-Yz1dg4e4WR@netmeister.org> Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 09:10:51 -0400 From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@...meister.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: describing affected systems (was: screen: Multiple Security Issues in Screen (mostly affecting release 5.0.0 and setuid-root installations)) Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281@...il.com> wrote: > Would "systems using pkgsrc-2025Q1, notably including NetBSD 9.x and NetBSD > 10.1" have been a fair way of describing that set? I think that's a lot better, although I would probably have phrased it as: Systems using screen(1) built from pkgsrc, including binary packages installed on NetBSD using e.g., pkg_add(1) or pkgin(1) before screen-5.0.0nb3 are affected. The details can get confusing, because you can use pkgsrc from sources from -current or a quarterly tagged branch across a range of operating systems, but can also install binary packages using at least two different tools, so ultimately neither the date nor the OS themselves matter as much as the package version number. (The "nb3" here signals that this is the 3rd pkgsrc specific version bump of the 5.0.0 upstream version.) But no need to further argue over the precise language. :-) -Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.