Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:13:50 -0400
From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@...isiblethingslab.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux: Disabling network namespaces

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:31:43PM +0200, Philippe Cerfon wrote:
> Hey.
> 
> There's even an allegedly "wontfix" bug of mine where I requested that
> Debian switches back to a secure default and disables user namesapce which
> have a long history of being exploitable:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012547
> 
> Don't think the current hole one will have been the last one.
> 
> Unfortunately it seems a feature that only a group of people will need is
> valued more important than keeping users secure. :-(

The problem with disabling unprivileged userns is that in the desktop
Linux case it actually causes serious problems, because creating a
sandbox is now a privileged operation.  IMO Landlock + seccomp is a much
better solution for sandboxing, but I don't think it can do everything
browsers need yet.

For containers, I'm not aware of a good solution right now.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.