[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:52:03 +0100
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: !CVE: A new platform to track security issues not
acknowledged by vendors
On 08/11/2023 14:22, !CVE Team wrote:
> ==============
> What is a !CVE
> ==============
>
> - A common place for !vulnerabilities (read not vulnerabilities)
>
> - Security issues not covered by the traditional CVE.
>
> - An identifier following common naming starting with an exclamation
> mark(!) Example: !CVE-2023-0001
I am not a lawyer, but I'd assume you would run into some issues with
the naming of all this -- wasn't that the exact issue that somebody else
ran into when they tried to assign identifiers to bugs that MITRE
wouldn't acknowledge? Here's what they said back then:
<https://cve.mitre.org/news/archives/2021/news.html#April022021_Message_to_DWF_from_the_CVE_Board>
I somehow doubt the presence of the ! makes much of a difference.
Vegard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
