Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:06:33 +0100 From: Johannes Segitz <jsegitz@...e.de> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: IMA gadgets On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 09:16:20PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > So in short, I don't really see how IMA signatures shipped as part of > all distribution packages, on all files, can provide value beyond that > of the hash that the already contain. It provides "the customer is happy" value. From a security POV it doesn't help much (on a normal Linux system, can be different if you really strip it down). But AMSI also doesn't help and people are still keen on enabling it, despite bypasses being available all the time. Same will happen for IMA. Johannes -- GPG Key EE16 6BCE AD56 E034 BFB3 3ADD 7BF7 29D5 E7C8 1FA0 Subkey fingerprint: 250F 43F5 F7CE 6F1E 9C59 4F95 BC27 DD9D 2CC4 FD66 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.