[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:42:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@...ple.dallas.tx.us>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Thousands of vulnerabilities, almost no CVEs:
OSS-Fuzz
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> So what are community thoughts on automatic CVE assignment?
> That would definitely get some attention to these bugs by vendors
> (because that's open CVEs in their products then). And this should be
> implementable because both OSS-Fuzz and syzbot are automated enough
> already. However I afraid that these CVEs may be as automatically
> sorted into a trashcan then :)
An excess of CVEs would cause CVEs to be not very meaningful any more.
Most oss-fuzz issue detections are not CVE worthy. For example, a
one-byte read "heap overflow" is not likely to cause any actual harm
but oss-fuzz would classify it as "heap overflow".
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@...ple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Public Key, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
