Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:36:06 +0100
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, dev@...ncontainers.org,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2019-5736: runc container breakout (all versions)

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:05:20AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> The vulnerability allows a malicious container to (with minimal user
> interaction) overwrite the host runc binary and thus gain root-level
> code execution on the host. The level of user interaction is being able
> to run any command (it doesn't matter if the command is not
> attacker-controlled) as root within a container in either of these
> contexts:
> 
>   * Creating a new container using an attacker-controlled image.
>   * Attaching (docker exec) into an existing container which the
>     attacker had previous write access to.

[...]

> == IMPACT ON OTHER PROJECTS ==
> 
> It should be noted that upon further investigation I've discovered that
> LXC has a similar vulnerability, and they have also pushed a similar
> patch[2] which we co-developed. LXC is a bit harder to exploit, but the
> same fundamental flaw exists.
> 
> After some discussion with the systemd-nspawn folks, it appears that
> they aren't vulnerable (because their method of attaching to a container
> uses a different method to LXC and runc).
> 
> I have been contacted by folks from Apache Mesos who said they were also
> vulnerable (I believe just using the exploit code that will be
> provided). It is quite likely that most container runtimes are
> vulnerable to this flaw, unless they took very strange mitigations
> before-hand.

While runc, LXC, and maybe other projects fix CVE-2019-5736 in userspace,
Virtuozzo/OpenVZ 7 has just released a kernel fix instead - please see
the forwarded message below.  Following links from there, I found the
following description of the issue in context of Virtuozzo and OpenVZ:

---
Security vulnerability: potential breakage of container isolation via symlinks to /proc/self/exe

Affected products:
* Virtuozzo 7 Update 8 and older
* OpenVZ 7

Not affected:
* Virtuozzo Infrastructure Platform 2.5
* Virtuozzo 6 and earlier versions
* OpenVZ 6

1. Overview
It was discovered that a malicious user inside a Virtuozzo container could
potentially overwrite "vzctl" binary on the host. The attacker could replace
executables in that container with symlinks to /proc/self/exe. After that,
"vzctl exec" called from the host to run one of such executables would try to
run the host's "vzctl" there instead. If the attacker managed to intercept
that, they would be able to change the contents of the host's "vzctl" binary.

CVSS v3 score: 7.2 (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H)

The issue is similar to CVE-2019-5736 , but affects "vzctl" rather than "runc".
---

I was curious about the kernel fix.  It doesn't appear to be in the
public git repository yet, where the latest is
3.10.0-862.20.2.vz7.73.25, whereas the fixed version is .27.  So I
downloaded the .src.rpm and found what I think is the fix in there:

---
* Mon Feb 11 2019 Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com> [3.10.0-862.20.2.vz7.73.27]
- proc/self/exe link validation (Vasily Averin) [PSBM-91042]
---

---
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
[...]
@@ -1617,6 +1749,26 @@ static const struct file_operations
proc_pid_set_comm_operations = {
        .release        = single_release,
 };
 
+#if CONFIG_VE
+#include "../mount.h"
+
+static inline int path_in_ve(struct path *path)
+{
+       struct ve_struct *ve = get_exec_env();
+
+       if (ve_is_super(ve) ||
+           (real_mount(path->mnt)->ve_owner == ve))
+               return 0;
+       else
+               return -EINVAL;
+}
+#else
+static inline int path_in_ve(struct path * path)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int proc_exe_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *exe_path)
 {
        struct task_struct *task;
@@ -1628,10 +1780,15 @@ static int proc_exe_link(struct dentry *dentry,
struct path *exe_path)
        exe_file = get_task_exe_file(task);
        put_task_struct(task);
        if (exe_file) {
-               *exe_path = exe_file->f_path;
-               path_get(&exe_file->f_path);
+               int result;
+
+               result = path_in_ve(&exe_file->f_path);
+               if (result == 0) {
+                       *exe_path = exe_file->f_path;
+                       path_get(&exe_file->f_path);
+               }
                fput(exe_file);
-               return 0;
+               return result;
        } else
                return -ENOENT;
 }
---

This uses Virtuozzo/OpenVZ specific APIs, so won't be directly usable
elsewhere, but maybe a similar approach could be used upstream?

Alexander

----- Forwarded message from Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com> -----

From: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>
To: OpenVZ users <users@...nvz.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:58:05 +0000
Subject: [Users] [NEW KERNEL] vzkernel-3.10.0-862.20.2.vz7.73.27 (with fix
 for CVE-2019-5736)

Hi All,

guess you are aware of recent security vulnerability CVE-2019-5736:
potential breakage of container isolation via symlinks to /proc/self/exe.

https://virtuozzosupport.force.com/s/article/000017636

We've built full vzkernel for OpenVZ users:
https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/factory/x86_64/os/Packages/v/vzkernel-3.10.0-862.20.2.vz7.73.27.x86_64.rpm

The kernel is based on stable kernel released as a part of Virtuozzo Infrastructure Platform product:
https://www.virtuozzo.com/products/virtuozzo-infrastructure-platform.html
http://repo.virtuozzo.com/vz-platform/releases/2.5/x86_64/os/Packages/v/

+ includes fixes provided via ReadyKernel for this kernel up to now:
https://readykernel.com/patch/Virtuozzo-7/readykernel-patch-73.24-72.0-1.vl7/

The kernel is based on stable kernel and passed basic validation.

--
Best regards,

Konstantin Khorenko,
Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@...nvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

----- End forwarded message -----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.