Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ftvjygyx.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:40:54 -0500
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@...thhorseman.net>
To: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: memory safety bugs in bc

On Thu 2018-11-29 10:18:18 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:

> Given Mitres guidance on "dcraw", as this is a standalone tool
> and only denial of service attacks I do not see a need for CVEs.

On my debian unstable system, i see 45 packages that depend on bc.

I haven't evaluated how many of those systems might pass untrusted input
to bc (maybe none!), but this is hardly "standalone".

Hanno, thanks for finding and reporting these problems!

     --dkg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.