Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:06:51 +0200
From: Guido Vranken <guidovranken@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: OpenVPN CVE-2017-12166: remote buffer overflow

This concerns a remote buffer overflow vulnerability in OpenVPN. It
has been fixed in OpenVPN 2.4.4 and 2.3.18, released on 26 Sept 2017.
It is suspected that only a small number of users is vulnerable to
this issue, because it requires having explicitly enabled the outdated
‘key method 1’.

The OpenVPN advisory can be found here:
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2017-12166

In ssl.c, key_method_1_read() calls read_key() which doesn’t perform
adequate bounds checks. cipher_length and hmac_length are specified by
the
peer:

1643 uint8_t cipher_length;
1644 uint8_t hmac_length;
1645
1646 CLEAR(*key);
1647 if (!buf_read(buf, &cipher_length, 1))
1648 {
1649     goto read_err;
1650 }
1651 if (!buf_read(buf, &hmac_length, 1))
1652 {
1653     goto read_err;
1654 }

And this many bytes of data are then read into key->cipher and key->hmac:

1656 if (!buf_read(buf, key->cipher, cipher_length))
1657 {
1658     goto read_err;
1659 }
1660 if (!buf_read(buf, key->hmac, hmac_length))
1661 {
1662     goto read_err;
1663 }

In other words, it’s a classic example of bounds check resulting in a
buffer overflow.

Like my previous set of OpenVPN vulnerabilities, this issue was also
found with fuzzing.

Guido

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.