Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17034856.l0NmUXmGEd@wanheda>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:03:16 +0200
From: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@...too.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: lame: multiple vulnerabilities

Hello all.

I discovered some crashes (which will follow one-by-one) in lame.

Lame was fuzzed in the past by someone else so I take the opportunity 
during the CVE request to insert also some past bugs.

1) Invalid read - CVE-2015-9099
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775959

2) Null pointer dereference - CVE-2015-9100
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777160

3) Invalid read - CVE-2015-9100
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777161

However, mitre decided that the bug N°3, CVE-2015-9100, can share the 
same CVE ID of https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/06/17/lame-heap-based-buffer-overflow-in-fill_buffer_resample-util-c/

At this point, I'd like to mention that mitre won't assign anymore CVE IDs 
for issues related to the Undefined Behavior Sanitizer, unless there are 
informations about the exploitability.
http://common-vulnerabilities-and-exposures-cve-board.1128451.n5.nabble.com/Current-standards-criteria-for-Undefined-Behavior-td730.html#a768

The CVE IDs assigned in the past for the undefined behavior issues remain 
valid. I will share anyway my findings about the undefined behavior issues. 
They include, for completeness, some bugs that regard the frontend. You 
can ignore them.

-- 
Agostino Sarubbo
Gentoo Linux Developer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.