Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:42:06 +0000
From: Fiedler Roman <>
To: "" <>,
        "" <>
Subject: Re: Vixie/ISC Cron group crontab to root escalation

> Von: Florian Weimer []
> On 06/13/2017 02:32 PM, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> > Well, partially: what O_PATH can do, you could also do before O_PATH
> using
> > repeated single-level open(NO_FOLLOW)/fstat-checks. So you had to do
> all the
> > verification by yourself.
> That's not completely accurate because open/close on device nodes can
> have side effects (the classic example is a rewinding tape device).
> O_PATH gives you an opportunity to perform these policy checks before
> the side effect happens.

So true, I know about this case. But my initial messages was not intended to 
compare subtle differences O_PATH with other OS file access functionality 
already available but - prove me wrong - to argue for extending open 
functionality in general using features O_PATH to my knowledge cannot provide. 
But all that content was removed in the first reply to the message.

LG Roman

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4814 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.