Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 20:15:06 +0200
From: Casper.Dik@...cle.com
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Vixie/ISC Cron group crontab to root escalation 


>On Jun 9,  6:27pm, solar@...nwall.com (Solar Designer) wrote:
>-- Subject: Re: [oss-security] Vixie/ISC Cron group crontab to root escalatio
>
>| Oh, I did in fact mention this in the private discussion, so I'll quote:
>| 
>| | Another detail: somehow in Owl we introduced lstat() prior to open, and
>| | check lstat()'s struct for all the required properties before proceeding
>| | with open() with O_NOFOLLOW.  Then we check that st_dev/st_ino stayed
>| | the same.  We also kept the post-open() checks.  I don't recall exactly
>| | why we added this, but maybe because of the possibility of side-effects
>| | on open() for hard links to device files (like with tape drives).  And
>| | it looks like we neglected to add the same for at jobs (perhaps didn't
>| | revisit this when support for at jobs appeared via our update to later
>| | OpenBSD code) - maybe we should.
>
>Thanks, perhaps a comment in the code can't hurt...
>Or even O_NODEV which does not exist, or O_PATH (linux only)..

As there is a O_DIRECTORY it would be more orthogonal to have O_REGULAR 
(open only a regular file).  But that becomes more and more icky as we're 
running out of 32 bits of O_*)

Casper

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.