[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:42:27 +0300
From: Dimitrios Glynos <dimitris@...sus-labs.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SquirrelMail <= 1.4.23 Remote Code Execution
(CVE-2017-7692)
On 25/04/2017 11:56 μμ, Stuart Gathman wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 05:14 PM, Dawid Golunski wrote:
>> SquirrelMail <= 1.4.23 Remote Code Execution (CVE-2017-7692)
>>
>> Desc.:
>> SquirrelMail is affected by a critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability
>> which stems from insufficient escaping of user-supplied data when
>> SquirrelMail has been configured with Sendmail as the main transport.
>> An authenticated attacker may be able to exploit the vulnerability
>> to execute arbitrary commands on the target and compromise the remote
>> system.
> We deploy squirrelmail NOT using sendmail for sending mail ($useSendmail
> = false). There is no reason not to use SMTP instead of running
> sendmail directly. It doesn't seem to be vulnerable that way - and I
> suggest that as a mitigation. Just to be sure, after reading this
> advisory I added $sendmail_path = '/usr/sbin/false'; (We always avoid
> direct command execution with PHP because PHP is prone to quoting bugs.)
>
> OT: is there already a utility that *safely* logs arguments and stdin
> (as was apparently used to explain the exploit)? I could write a C
> prog, or a carefully quoted bash script - but would rather use an
> already proven utility.
>
For execve logging (just arguments) see 'snoopy'. It catches exec
calls using LDPRELOAD, so it misses them only if the calls are
made from a static binary (which I don't believe php or sendmail
are).
HTH,
Dimitris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
