Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:03:24 +0100 From: Raphael Geissert <geissert@...ian.org> To: Open Source Security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: MITRE is adding data intake to its CVE ID process Hi, On 12 February 2017 at 00:35, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:59:27PM -0500, cve-assign@...re.org wrote: >> C5. I want MITRE to send the https://cveform.mitre.org form data, and >> the CVE ID, to the oss-security list at the same time that these are >> sent to the requester. >> >> R5. We have had internal discussions within MITRE about this. We are >> able to implement this easily if the community requires this approach. >> At the moment, we are expecting the requester to resend this >> information to oss-security once they accept their CVE ID assignment. [...] > MITRE - can you please implement that, and we'll see how it goes and > whether we need it adjusted or possibly discontinued if things go wrong > or if there's opposition (so far, there's almost none)? > >> Please see http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/09/26 >> for an example. > > This is also an example of how the change breaks threading. First, > there was a thread about the issue on the list. Then there was CVE > request and assignment off-list. And then there's this new thread on > the CVE assignment. If this was to be implemented, the submitter could also just include the message-id of the related oss-sec post. The mail by MITRE could then set a In-Reply-To accordingly to avoid thread breaking. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.