Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:14:52 +0100 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: pali@...n.org Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: posting without being subscribed (was: Use after free in libmysqlclient.so) On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 06:46:43PM +0100, pali@...n.org wrote: > On Friday 10 February 2017 17:39:45 Solar Designer wrote: > > As far as I can tell, pali@...n.org is not subscribed. > > No, I'm not. I hope it is not a requirement. Not a requirement, but you should expect to miss replies if you're not subscribed, especially if you didn't state so in your posting. Another issue is that now that you brought the reply back to the list, you almost broke the thread. I fixed that by manually editing the headers on your message before approving it (as a list admin). Sometimes I do that, although I don't consider it to be part of my "job". If a co-moderator were to approve your message first, then your message would have started a new thread rather than being added to the existing thread. That's not great. So we'd appreciate it if you do subscribe to the list for the duration of discussions you participate in, or at least explicitly state when you're posting without being subscribed (ask to be CC'ed on replies). Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.