Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:43:32 +0000 From: Sevan Janiyan <venture37@...klan.co.uk> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Being vulnerable to POODLE On 28/12/2015 17:22, Florian Weimer wrote: > Yes, this is what my meant, the documented SSL_OP_ALL setting is not > really safe. But this is a different vulnerability from POODLE. Understood. Should I request a CVE for the use of SSL_OP_ALL which enables SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS or use an existing CVE? (CVE-2011-3389?) Sevan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.