Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:43:32 +0000
From: Sevan Janiyan <>
Subject: Re: Being vulnerable to POODLE

On 28/12/2015 17:22, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Yes, this is what my meant, the documented SSL_OP_ALL setting is not
> really safe.  But this is a different vulnerability from POODLE.

Should I request a CVE for the use of SSL_OP_ALL which enables
SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS or use an existing CVE? (CVE-2011-3389?)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.