[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:42:53 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: lldpd crash in lldp_decode due large management address
* Florian Weimer:
> Upstream commit:
>
> <https://github.com/vincentbernat/lldpd/commit/dd4f16e7e816f2165fba76e3d162cd8d2978dcb2>
>
> If compiled with effective source fortification, the vulnerability is
> just a crash and not exploitable for anything else, as a result of the
> compiler-emitted length check for memcpy inside the PEEK_BYTES macro.
There is also another fix, an improper assert leading to a daemon
crash:
https://github.com/vincentbernat/lldpd/commit/793526f8884455f43daecd0a2c46772388417a00
This probably needs a separate CVE ID.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
