Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:00:15 +0200
From: Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: oss security list <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Linux x86_64 NMI security issues

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:34:50AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2015 6:28 AM, "Petr Matousek" <pmatouse@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:12:00AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On kernels that are patched for BadIRET and have a fixup_bad_iret
> > > function (which should be most kernels that are keeping up with
> > > low-level security issues), there are two cases.
> > >
> > > Case 1a (more up-to-date kernels where INTERRUPT_RETURN is "jmp
> > > irq_return"): fixup_bad_iret will be invoked and will attempt to
> > > recover.  There's a narrow window in which a new NMI will cause
> > > corruption, in which case all bets are off.  That could hang, crash,
> > > or possibly be exploited for privilege escalation.
> > >
> > > Case 1b (less up-to-date kernels where INTERRUPT_RETURN is "iretq"):
> > > The kernel will try to OOPS due to a bad kernel fault, except that the
> > > OOPS will be processed with the wrong gsbase.  This is basically the
> > > BadIRET condition, and is probably exploitable using similar
> > > techniques to BadIRET.
> >
> > Could you please explain the backtrace leading to this?  You mean the
> > nested nmi return which invokes INTERRUPT_RETURN and in case
> > INTERRUPT_RETURN is "iretq", error_kernelspace won't detect that and
> > won't fixup the gs?
> 
> I mean the normal (non-nested) NMI return.  If we return with iretq, then
> the error_bad_iret fixup won't trigger at all because that iretq
> instruction has no fixup entry or swapgs special case.

Hmm, sorry, my bad. I've been looking at rhel-7 -- I see two ways to exit
the NMI handler there -- INTERRUPT_RETURN after the nested_nmi_out label,
which should only trigger on nested NMIs and thus be safe, and the second
one after the nmi_restore label which does jmp irq_return.

And irq_return is:

irq_return:                                                                                                                                                                                                    
	INTERRUPT_RETURN                                                                                                                                                                                       
	_ASM_EXTABLE(irq_return, bad_iret)

and error_kernelspace checking for irq_return

error_kernelspace:                                                                                                                                                                                             
	incl %ebx                                                                                                                                                                                              
	leaq irq_return(%rip),%rcx                                                                                                                                                                             
	cmpq %rcx,RIP+8(%rsp)                                                                                                                                                                                  
	je error_swapgs                                                                                                                                                                                        


Now the paravirt iret case is not protected by the error_kernelspace
fixup. How much that is a problem is something I'm going to have a look
at ...

-- 
Petr Matousek / Red Hat Product Security
PGP: 0xC44977CA 8107 AF16 A416 F9AF 18F3  D874 3E78 6F42 C449 77CA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.