Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:51:38 +0530 (IST)
From: P J P <>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <>
cc: oss security list <>,
Subject: Re: Re: CVE request Linux kernel: ns: user namespaces

  Hello Eric,

+-- On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Eric W. Biederman wrote --+
| There are no dependencies between
| e0c9c0afd2fc958ffa34b697972721d81df8a56f and
| cd4a40174b71acd021877341684d8bb1dc8ea4ae

  Sorry if I misunderstood; I was referring to

|| >> From: (Eric W. Biederman)
|| >> So I believe cd4a40174b71acd021877341684d8bb1dc8ea4ae prevents a
|| >> difficult to trigger crash if you have
|| >> e0c9c0afd2fc958ffa34b697972721d81df8a56f applied.

  And also that, commit 'e0c9c0afd2' improvises upon 'ce07d891a089'; So unless 
'ce07d891a089' is present, 'e0c9c0afd2' would not apply cleanly.

| Neither commit (cec9c... or cd4a4017...) missing is a problem unless
| ce07d891a0891d3c0d0c2d73d577490486b809e1 is present.
| Commits (cec9c... and cd4a4017...) are harmless on their own.
| I hope that clarifies things.

  Did you mean commit 'e0c9c0afd2'? (couldn't find commit 'cec9c...')

Thank you.
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.