[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:04:11 +0200
From: Alessandro Ghedini <alessandro@...dini.me>
To: cve-assign@...re.org
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: redis Lua sandbox escape and arbitrary code
execution
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:56:09PM -0400, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> > redis 3.0.2 and 2.8.21 have been released
>
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/redis-db/4Y6OqK8gEyk/Dg-5cejl-eUJ
> > http://benmmurphy.github.io/blog/2015/06/04/redis-eval-lua-sandbox-escape/
> > https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/fdf9d455098f54f7666c702ae464e6ea21e25411
>
> The Ben Murphy advisory has a long discussion of many software and
> deployment issues. Do you have a specific viewpoint about what the CVE
> ID should be for? In particular, is the essence of the request that
> the Redis upstream vendor believes that loading Lua bytecode was, by
> itself, inherently an implementation mistake in Redis, and is now
> fixed by the
> https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/fdf9d455098f54f7666c702ae464e6ea21e25411
> change?
Yes, that was the idea.
Cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
