[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:09:48 -0700
From: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...gle.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> Hi Tavis,
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 04:50:08PM -0700, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
>> [as-per previous discussion on the vendors list, skipping closed
>> discussion of low-severity issue]
>
> What "vendors list" do you mean? Do you possibly mean "vendor's" rather
> than "vendors" - that is, upstream's list? (I do not recall seeing this
> on the linux-distros list.)
Actually, I was referring to the discussion on linux-distros about
apport and abrt.
> Either way, it sounds weird to keep a low severity issue private. Low
> severity usually means not needing an embargo in the first place. But I
> guess it was the vendor's preference?
Sure, I didn't mention it for the benefit of anyone actually working
on linux security. I just wanted to be clear this was expected, as
unfortunately my posts tend to get undesired attention.
Tavis.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
