[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:31:35 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: CVE Request: Multiple vulnerabilities in freexl
1.0.0g
On 2015-03-27 09:54, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
>> I found multiple issues in the library FreeXL 1.0.0g.
>> The vendor has corrected these issues in FreeXL 1.0.1 , and a diff for
>> the four issues is available here:
>
> We don't feel that this has information in a usable format for making
> all of the CVE assignments.
Aren't you usually combine similar issues into one CVE anyway? Same
reported type ("stack corruption", at least for #1--3), same disclosure
date, same fixed version, no info about first vulnerable version...
Or there are subtle differences somewhere?
--
Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
