Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:31:35 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE Request: Multiple vulnerabilities in freexl

On 2015-03-27 09:54, wrote:
>> I found multiple issues in the library FreeXL 1.0.0g.
>> The vendor has corrected these issues in FreeXL 1.0.1 , and a diff for
>> the four issues is available here:
> We don't feel that this has information in a usable format for making
> all of the CVE assignments.

Aren't you usually combine similar issues into one CVE anyway? Same 
reported type ("stack corruption", at least for #1--3), same disclosure 
date, same fixed version, no info about first vulnerable version...
Or there are subtle differences somewhere?

Alexander Cherepanov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.