Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:09:17 -0800 From: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...gle.com> To: Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@...eolan.org> Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>, Assign a CVE Identifier <cve-assign@...re.org> Subject: Re: Re: [videolan] older issues in libbluray On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@...eolan.org> wrote: > On 24 Feb, Tavis Ormandy wrote : >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@...eolan.org> wrote: >> > >> > On 23 Feb, Kurt Seifried wrote : >> > > Again my apologies for this mess. The good news is that all our current >> > > embargoed flaws (none against VLC currently =) are being actively >> > > handled (e.g. worked on in a current time frame) and moving forwards we >> > > should hopefully be able to avoid issues like this. >> > >> > One libbluray issue was already fixed. >> > The second one is not really fixable, since BD-J is actually executing >> > java code from the outside. >> >> Forgive my unfamiliarity with BluRay, but based on what you just said, >> it seems like the solution is what was described in the report: just >> use a JSM? > > I don't see the JSM mentioned in the bugreport. > I didn't get the bug report, I was referring to the subject Florian pasted, "missing Java Security Manager sandbox in the BD-J implementation". If you run untrusted java, you would normally use a JSM, if you don't use one that does sound like a bug to me. Sigh, embargoes. Tavis.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.