[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:08:49 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: cpio -- directory traversal
On 2015-02-02 20:48, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
> * Dne Friday 16. January 2015, 03:44:25 [CET] Alexander Cherepanov napsal:
>> cpio is susceptible to a directory traversal vulnerability via symlinks.
>
> Here's a patch we use in SUSE for some time.
Thanks for sharing!
> It forbids to write over symlinks, similar to bsdtar.
Nice, this is a simple and easy approach. But I wonder if it's widely
acceptable. GNU tar follows symlinks which are not extracted from the
archive and, in http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/08/4,
Florian Weimer said: "If [the current directory] already contains
symbolic links, some users expect that those links are followed because
they have used symlinks to move part of the file system tree to
somewhere else (perhaps a large file system)."
--
Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
