Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:08:49 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <>
Subject: Re: CVE Request: cpio -- directory traversal

On 2015-02-02 20:48, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
> * Dne Friday 16. January 2015, 03:44:25 [CET] Alexander Cherepanov napsal:
>> cpio is susceptible to a directory traversal vulnerability via symlinks.
> Here's a patch we use in SUSE for some time.

Thanks for sharing!

> It forbids to write over symlinks, similar to bsdtar.

Nice, this is a simple and easy approach. But I wonder if it's widely 
acceptable. GNU tar follows symlinks which are not extracted from the 
archive and, in, 
Florian Weimer said: "If [the current directory] already contains 
symbolic links, some users expect that those links are followed because 
they have used symlinks to move part of the file system tree to 
somewhere else (perhaps a large file system)."

Alexander Cherepanov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.