Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:16:43 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <>
Subject: Re: CVE request: lhasa: directory traversals

On 2015-01-14 20:33, Henri Salo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:44:00PM +0300, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
> All of these commits are only in versions 0.1.0 and 0.2.0 so no need for
> "incomplete fix for" CVE(s).

Yeah, all of them are between 0.0.7 and 0.1.0. But '..' and symlinks are 
usually seen as different issues.

> Use cases would have be nice.

An example for '..' is easy:

$ touch ../rel
$ jlha a test.lzh ../rel
$ rm ../rel
$ lhasa x test.lzh

But jlha front-end doesn't handle symlinks so you have to use non-free 
lha to archive symlinks. There are some examples in the lhasa repo though:

Alexander Cherepanov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.