Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:38:00 +0300 From: Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root@...nwall.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com CC: cve-assign@...re.org Subject: Re: CVE request: file(1) DoS On 16.01.2015 16:15, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On 2015-01-03 02:50 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote: >> On 2014-12-17 03:44, Alexander Cherepanov wrote: >>> There are two more DoSes fixed in ELF parser of file(1), similar to the >>> recent CVE-2014-8116. >> >> These fixes were included in 5.22 release: >> >> http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/file/2015/001660.html >> >>> 1. Limit the number of ELF notes processed >>> Report: http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/file/2014/001653.html >>> Fix: https://github.com/file/file/commit/ce90e05774dd77d86cfc8dfa6da57b32816841c4 >> >> This issue seems to be introduced here: >> >> https://github.com/file/file/commit/956a45ab1c54b11304b367056f41905e72a02380#diff-bc5c24ef9f39a5f4963ca28ecbc645b3L423 >> >> >> which ended up in 5.08 release. Hence releases 5.08--5.21 are vulnerable. >> >>> 2. Limit string printing to 100 chars >>> Report: http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/file/2014/001654.html >>> Fix: https://github.com/file/file/commit/65437cee25199dbd385fb35901bc0011e164276c >> >> This issue was introduced in the following commit: >> >> https://github.com/file/file/commit/c8451af8ab0c2e2a93ce93b9c68257d31576cc85 >> >> which ended up in 5.16 release. Hence releases 5.16--5.21 are vulnerable. >> >>> Both problems amplified by the fact that the same section in ELF file >>> can be referenced and processed by file(1) multiple times. This is also >>> fixed in the first commit linked above. >>> >>> Could CVE(s) please be assigned? >> > > Did these ever get CVEs? Not that I know of. -- Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.