Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:32:13 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE-2014-7970: Linux VFS denial of service On 10/08/2014 12:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > pivot_root has a bug. Exploiting it at all is tricky, but it can be > done. I'm reasonably confident that this is just denial of service. > (There's also probably an information disclosure in there, but I think > that it's only available to root, so it's not a big deal.) > > I'm posting this a little bit early, since a patch is publicly > available, the impact is low, and hitting the bad code path at all is > quite tedious. I'll send a proof of concept later on. > > Distros: if you need a test case to validate the fix, let me know. > Although, for validation, it should be sufficient to just chroot > somewhere as root, escape the chroot (while still chrooted), and then > pivot_root(".", ".") on a mountpoint. > > Candidate patch here: > > http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=87bnpmihks.fsf%40x220.int.ebiederm.org > The mitre.org description is: The pivot_root implementation in fs/namespace.c in the Linux kernel through 3.17 does not properly interact with certain locations of a chroot directory, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (mount-tree loop) via . (dot) values in both arguments to the pivot_root system call. This is a bit misleading. Passing "." to both arguments of the pivot_root system call is a perfectly fine (albeit brain-bending) thing to do. The bug was that, if either argument to pivot_root referred to a directory outside of the calling processes's chroot, then pivot_root would malfunction, corrupting the mount tree. --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.